Quick summary
Performance appraisal (कार्यमूल्यमापन) is the systematic evaluation of how well an employee does his job compared with set standards. Its results are used for pay rises, promotions, transfers, training and feedback. Methods range from old ones like ranking and confidential reports to modern ones like MBO and 360-degree feedback.
Key points
- Dale Yoder: performance appraisal includes all formal procedures used to evaluate personalities, contributions and potential of group members.
- Objectives: decide promotions and pay increases, find training needs, give feedback, improve performance, validate selection methods, plan careers.
- Process: set standards → communicate them → measure actual performance → compare with standards → discuss results with the employee → take action (reward, training, counselling).
- Traditional methods: straight ranking, paired comparison, graphic rating scale, checklist, forced choice, forced distribution (bell curve), critical incident method, essay method, confidential report (used in government).
- Modern methods: Management by Objectives (MBO) – introduced by Peter Drucker (The Practice of Management, 1954): manager and employee jointly set goals and review results; BARS (behaviourally anchored rating scales); assessment centre; 360-degree feedback (from superiors, peers, subordinates, customers and self); human resource accounting.
- Common errors: halo effect (one good trait colours the whole rating), horns effect, leniency or strictness, central tendency, recency effect, personal bias.
- A good appraisal system is clear, fair, consistent, job-related, regular and open to discussion.
Important terms
- Halo effect – rating an employee high on everything because of one good quality.
- Central tendency – giving average ratings to everyone to avoid decisions.
- Critical incident – a record of especially good or bad behaviour on the job.
- Potential appraisal – judging whether an employee can handle higher jobs in future.
Key facts
- Paired comparison: number of pairs = N(N − 1) ÷ 2, where N is the number of employees. For 5 employees: 5 × 4 ÷ 2 = 10 pairs.
| Method | Who appraises | Main feature |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | Supervisor | Employees placed from best to worst |
| Graphic rating scale | Supervisor | Traits rated on a scale (e.g. 1–5) |
| Critical incident | Supervisor | Based on recorded key events |
| MBO | Employee + superior | Results against jointly set goals |
| 360-degree | Many raters | All-round feedback |
5 important questions
Q1. What is the halo effect?
A rating error where the appraiser's impression of one trait of the employee (good or bad) influences the ratings of all other traits.
Q2. What is 360-degree feedback?
An appraisal method in which an employee is rated by everyone around him – superiors, peers, subordinates, customers – along with self-appraisal.
Q3. Explain the objectives and process of performance appraisal.
Outline: objectives listed above; six steps of the process with explanation; importance of feedback interview.
Q4. Explain the traditional and modern methods of performance appraisal.
Outline: four or five traditional methods with merits/demerits; MBO steps (set goals, action plan, periodic review, final evaluation); BARS, assessment centre, 360-degree; conclusion that modern methods are more objective and participative.
Q5. Explain the problems in performance appraisal and how to overcome them.
Outline: errors (halo, horns, leniency, central tendency, recency, bias, unclear standards); remedies – clear standards, training raters, multiple raters, documentation of critical incidents, regular reviews, employee participation.
Exam tip
Mention Peter Drucker and the year 1954 with MBO; it is a common short-note and the name adds weight to your answer.